Manual screening in Chrome, mobile-friendly screening on the web, or AI-assisted local screening with Chrome's built-in Nano model — all designed to help researchers move faster without losing methodological control.
Fast human-led title and abstract screening with criteria guidance, keyword highlighting, keyboard shortcuts, and reviewer-friendly export.
A streamlined Streamlit app for quick screening sessions, especially useful on mobile devices and lightweight workflows.
Includes the manual workflow plus one-by-one and automated AI-assisted screening using Chrome's native Nano model.
Start with the workflow that matches your review stage, your device, and your preferred level of automation.
A Chrome extension for structured manual screening. Ideal when you want full reviewer control with fast navigation and standardized export.
A lightweight Streamlit web app that keeps screening simple and accessible across desktop and mobile devices.
The AI-assisted Chrome extension. It includes the manual workflow plus AI-supported screening one-by-one or across the whole file.
Built for systematic reviews, scoping reviews, evidence synthesis projects, and practical screening workflows.
Use Inclusion/Exclusion criteria or PICO fields to keep reviewers aligned during screening.
Navigate quickly with decision buttons, shortcut keys, notes, and color-coded keyword highlighting.
Track totals, included studies, excluded studies, maybe decisions, and remaining records in real time.
Work with common screening files such as CSV and Excel, with tool-specific support for broader workflows.
Use the web app when mobile access matters, and Chrome extensions when in-browser workflow matters most.
For users who want AI assistance, NanoScreen adds local browser-based support using Chrome's native Nano model.
Pick Manual for reviewer-led screening, Mobile for flexible browser access, or AI for local AI-supported workflow.
Import your study list, define reviewer guidance with criteria or PICO, and set inclusion and exclusion keywords.
Review titles and abstracts, capture decisions and notes, and export your updated file for the next review stage.
If you want a simple recommendation, use this quick guide.
Discover practical articles for evidence synthesis, criteria design, and screening workflows.
A practical comparison of leading tools for researchers, including privacy, workflow, and feature trade-offs.
Read Article →
Learn how to define stronger PICO guidance and apply it consistently during title and abstract screening.
Read Article →
See how faster review workflows can reduce bottlenecks without removing the reviewer from the decision process.
Read Article →